On 2014-03-05 10:07, Anthony Wong wrote (on the merge proposal): > We should not remove ibus-pinyin if 1. another pinyin substitute is > not going to replace ibus-pinyin,
Well, that won't happen in 14.04 unless a few IM users rapidly and convincingly answer Sebastien's message at ubuntu-devel. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2014-February/038104.html > and 2. another input method framework is not going to be replace > ibus. That will certainly not happen in 14.04. ibus-pinyin is the only IM engine that is currently seeded. Considering that both Xiaojun Ma and Aron Xu said that ibus-sunpinyin is better, I thought it made sense to not keep seeding it and with that follow the original suggestion in this bug report. Maybe we should ask ourselves: Which impression do we make on Chinese users if we seed an IM engine that we don't consider to be the best available engine? The IM engine pulled when simplified Chinese is installed is ibus-sunpinyin anyway. On 2014-03-05 09:49, Aron Xu wrote: > How about pulling in ibus-qt4? You tell us. Since you suggest it, I suppose it would make a difference somehow. ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164252 Title: Improve default selection of IBus related packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntukylin/+bug/1164252/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
