Public bug reported: [Why]
Ubuntu Cloud installer is a metal to cloud image that provides an extremely simple way to install, deploy and scale an openstack cloud on top of Ubuntu server. Initial configurations are available for single physical system deployments as well as multiple physical system deployments. [Source] bzr: lp:cloud-installer ppa: ppa:cloud-installer/ppa tarball: https://launchpad.net/cloud-installer/trunk/v0.2/+download/cloud-install_0.2.orig.tar.gz [Checklist] Packaging review MUST: [Y] Package must meet Ubuntu versioning & Maintainer requirements [Y] Package must match current Ubuntu (and Debian) packaging policies [Y] Package must build, install, run, remove, and purge cleanly SHOULD: [N] Package should be lintian clean - made some overrides to dh_installinit as it was erroring on no /etc/init.d/cloud-install even though we only have an upstart file [Y] Contents of debian/ should be sane [Y] Changelog should close a "needs-packaging" bug [Y] Package should follow http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html Maintenance review MUST: [Y] Package must contain a watch file or get-orig-source rule [N/A] If upstream is no more, the packager should consider adopting the upstream package somewhere [N :(] Packages who implement get-orig-source for packages with watch files get extra points [Y] Packaged version must not have any known security or critical bugs SHOULD: [Y] Packaging scripts should be readable and readily comprehensible [Y] Upstream should be responsive, and maintain a bug tracker [Y] Packaged version should be latest upstream [Y] Package should not be native without an approved spec Suitability review MUST: [Y] Package must meet copyright / licensing requirements [Y] Non-native packages must have verifiable cryptographic path to upstream source [Waiting] Package must be advocated by at least two members of ubuntu-dev (the packager may count as one) SHOULD: [Y] Package should work on a standard Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu/etc. system [Y] Package should provide hints to system services (app-install-data, menus, etc.) to ease installation and use [Y] Package should provide Ubuntu-specific documentation for variances in behaviour from upstream [Y] Package should provide a Homepage: header in debian/control Thanks ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: Ubuntu Trusty Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: Ubuntu U-series Importance: High Status: New ** Also affects: Ubuntu Trusty Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: Ubuntu U-series Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: Ubuntu Trusty Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: Ubuntu U-series Importance: Undecided => High ** Description changed: [Why] - Ubuntu Cloud installer is a metal to cloud image that provides an extremely - simple way to install, deploy and scale an openstack cloud on top of - Ubuntu server. Initial configurations are available for single - physical system deployments as well as multiple physical system - deployments. + Ubuntu Cloud installer is a metal to cloud image that provides an extremely + simple way to install, deploy and scale an openstack cloud on top of + Ubuntu server. Initial configurations are available for single + physical system deployments as well as multiple physical system + deployments. [Source] - bzr: - lp:cloud-installer + bzr: + lp:cloud-installer + + ppa: + ppa:cloud-installer/ppa tarball: https://launchpad.net/cloud-installer/trunk/v0.2/+download/cloud-install_0.2.orig.tar.gz [Checklist] Packaging review MUST: [Y] Package must meet Ubuntu versioning & Maintainer requirements [Y] Package must match current Ubuntu (and Debian) packaging policies [Y] Package must build, install, run, remove, and purge cleanly SHOULD: [N] Package should be lintian clean - - made some overrides to dh_installinit as it was erroring on no /etc/init.d/cloud-install even though we only have an upstart file + - made some overrides to dh_installinit as it was erroring on no /etc/init.d/cloud-install even though we only have an upstart file [Y] Contents of debian/ should be sane [Y] Changelog should close a "needs-packaging" bug [Y] Package should follow http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html Maintenance review MUST: [Y] Package must contain a watch file or get-orig-source rule [N/A] If upstream is no more, the packager should consider adopting the upstream package somewhere [N :(] Packages who implement get-orig-source for packages with watch files get extra points [Y] Packaged version must not have any known security or critical bugs SHOULD: [Y] Packaging scripts should be readable and readily comprehensible [Y] Upstream should be responsive, and maintain a bug tracker [Y] Packaged version should be latest upstream [Y] Package should not be native without an approved spec Suitability review MUST: [Y] Package must meet copyright / licensing requirements [Y] Non-native packages must have verifiable cryptographic path to upstream source [Waiting] Package must be advocated by at least two members of ubuntu-dev (the packager may count as one) SHOULD: [Y] Package should work on a standard Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu/etc. system [Y] Package should provide hints to system services (app-install-data, menus, etc.) to ease installation and use [Y] Package should provide Ubuntu-specific documentation for variances in behaviour from upstream [Y] Package should provide a Homepage: header in debian/control Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1282837 Title: FFe: new package cloud-install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1282837/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
