> They can easily be ported to libavresample. With FFmpeg we can have both libswresample and libavresample. Asking everyone to use libavresample is a waste of resource and there is no gain at all.
> This would break a lot of software, produce more work for ubuntu developers, and would cause less software to build. Can you name a software that only builds with Libav? It's the switching to Libav that breaks enough out-of-repository software. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263278 Title: Use FFmpeg instead of Libav To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/1263278/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
