Hello :) > Which I reported already a couple of months ago. > I already offered a solution, but I _never_ received an e-mail about > this matter by the maintainer team. > I should really get worried but I found my way out of this trouble.
I've had the same trouble, with bugs I've reported. In the end, I gave up, and triaged about 20-30 bugs. > > This software working well is *key* to Ubuntu adoption in > enterprise > > applications. (Workplace offices.) > Indeed I still use Debian for enterprise solutions. Ubuntu is good for > a > home-office or a end-user to see what's next in Debian, because the > release cycles are very, hm, rare... > > Preferably, it needs to work off the > > shelf. > That's exactly what I'm on about. Did you have a look at the lots of > (unresolved) bugs in Ubuntu? I've triaged some of them. Most of them, just need someone to do IT gopher work, and do the basic level triaging. It doesn't help that there is a new bug added every 5 minutes, give or take, and it takes a lot longer than 5 minutes to triage each bug... > > There is no way that anyone with more than 20+ machines to > > maintain will run around installing the "Official" version of OO, > > on each of them. > You know how the package sytstem works? > Of course there is a solution for +200 and more machines if you need > a working version of OpenOffice. > > Yes, they could automate a script to do it, but it will > > introduce a version of OO that *is not* supported by Ubunt > > > Ever heared of apt-pinning? > You can tell the system to prefer certain packages. > You just have to alter the apt-sources-list to your needs, heres a > howto: > > http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html Never heard of it, thanks for the link! At the moment, we're leaning towards LTSP systems, rather than mass-desktop deployments. (Two beefy servers serving desktop onto a whole load of HP thin clients...) > What could happen, really, if you install a version that is running > like you expect it to? > You won't run into trouble, if you use the complete package by the > DEBIAN team, because the .deb packages are not compiled or supported > by OOo. > Double trouble? > No, I don't think so, just a working application. > http://openoffice.debian.net/ > Have a look in the SID-tree. It is Still In Development but working > better, as the Ubuntu package (but I spotted different bugs, but > those > ones went to bugs.debian.org and were already resolved) > The Debian and Ubuntu systems appear to be slowly becoming more separated with each release, as Ubuntu loads its particular variables and patches to the pulls from the debian repos. > If you want to run a good piece of software in a company I will > suggest > and prefer Debian, or a LTS version of Ubuntu, which is still > Dapper... > We're moving someone to Feisty from Dapper atm, because of some of the fun *unresolved* bugs in it. (gnome-cups-icon eats 100% cpu, among others) > Don't worry, Gutsy's on the way. > (With a new pack of bugs, for shure!) > > Kind regards from germany, > Steffen > > -- > Form Wizard in Base does not complete > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72262 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct > subscriber > of a duplicate bug. -- Form Wizard in Base does not complete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
