On 30-07-13 21:27, Adam Niedling wrote: > Paul: I don't see why a separate bug report is needed for 64bit. Usually > there is no need for reporting two bugs for the same faulty behavior.
Because I believe that the bug is different. Maybe the error message is the same, but I really expect the source code that caused the original bug to be different. The original bug was not a bug in the tuxcmd package and only manifested itself on i386, while later a bug on amd64 was reported. Nobody investigated that latter bug though, a proper backtrace with debugging symbols would help. Paul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577728 Title: tuxcmd: Access violation on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tuxcmd/+bug/577728/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
