I have read a news in french about the OCZ SSD discs. It appears that the bios flash can be done with several ways, and one of its ways induce the limitation of disc to SATA II (whereas the disc is optimized to SATA III). I remember that before installing the system, I have flashed the BIOS, but I don't remember what I have done exactly. Moreover, I can't flash another time the bios without reseting all my data. So it is possible that the problem comes from the disc. But if it is the case, I can't explain the difference of speed between windows and ubuntu (one with SATA III speeds, and the other with SATA II speeds).
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889071 Title: SATA III recognized as SATA II (chipset intel z68) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/889071/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
