Left a widely known buggy application that does not accomplish what it was supposed to do won't help either... It is not a main application. We all could live without it. Just create a Trash icon on the desktop and forget about this buggy applet until it get fixed.
I think I did not made my point clear. I believe giving Ubuntu users a buggy day by day experience will not make them happy. I am trying to say that if a software is not mature to get into an Ubuntu release, then it should wait until the next one. Letting thousands of people loose time with a buggy application on a release is not a good thing to let happen. The point I am trying to target here is Ubuntu quality software. One example is my Firefox that I've just updated and got all broken (I made a bug report and a couple of other users had the same issue). One day Ubuntu works, the other it is broken (FF is THE main application I use with Ubuntu). I am using a clean release distribution, there should not have broken applications with it. Should it? I am not in control of Ubuntu, I am just making a suggestion here that I believe all community would be happy with. I may be wrong. Please do not pick me wrong. On 7/23/07, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > removing applications because they have bugs is not a constructive way > to do things and you would not many software left to install if any > > -- > Trash looks empty, isn't > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72468 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Fabio Pugliese Ornellas E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6516089 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://ornellas.apanela.com/ -- Trash looks empty, isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
