This is not a bug. It's quite intentional that libs's preinst bombs if
you have extra copies of libc (in this case, an ancient libc 2.11?) in
your search path. Is there a reason you need that there?
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065477
Title:
update failure because of libc
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1065477/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
