Yes, I'd say that "wontfix" is appropriate unless someone comes forward with a reason why ntpd *should* listen at 127.0.1.1.
P.S. I earlier wrote the following. > It appears that bind9 operates in the same way. > I added a virtual interface eth0:0 with a bogus address > and named started listening on that without being > restarted. I later discovered that this occurs because bind9 has a hook script in /etc/network/if-up.d/ which does "rndc reconfig". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604283 Title: ntpd does not listen on 127.0.1.1, the IP address associated with the system hostname To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/604283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
