** Description changed:

- Release of Ubuntu: Raring 13.04
- Package Version: 2.5ubuntu1
- Expected Results: rcconf should run in Ubuntu by default because whiptail is 
installed
- Actual Results: rcconf fail to run, people is forced to install dialog to 
make it run
+ [IMPACT]
  
- whiptail changed its path since ubuntu precise:
+ By default rcconf doesn't work unless users install dialog, which is not
+ necessary because whiptail is installed by default in Ubuntu systems.
  
- newt (0.52.11-2ubuntu10) precise; urgency=low
+ [TESTCASE]
  
-   * Move libnewt to /lib and whiptail to /bin so they can be used by
-     friendly-recovery on systems that have a separate /usr.
+  * Install rcconf package
+    $ sudo apt-get install rcconf
+  * Try to run it
+    $ sudo rcconf
+  * It displays  "rcconf needs dialog or whiptail" and fail to run
+  * Update with the -proposed package
+  * Rerun rcconf
+   $ sudo rcconf
+  * It should run the program
  
- rcconf have a hardcoded path to whiptail who points out to
- /usr/bin/whiptail , in Ubuntu it's in /bin/whiptail, therefore a rcconf
- change needs to be done in order to find whiptail and avoid installing
- dialog, which is not necessary since rcconf works fine with the ubuntu
- whiptail version.
+ [Regression Potential]
  
- This bug is also found in ubuntu:
+ None, it's a change to the whiptail path. However if the whiptail path
+ changes again, it'll broke rcconf
  
- quantal
- precise
+ [Other Info]
+ 
+ This change only affects Ubuntu, since the Ubuntu whiptail version lives
+ in /bin while the debian version in /usr/bin

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089724

Title:
  rcconf fail to run with whiptail installed, only in Ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rcconf/+bug/1089724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to