[Caleb: thanks for finding the origin of this "fix"] So it seems this sleep "fix", by just restarting (I thought Debian was not an ancient Microsoft product where one just reboots all the time), which was not tested is now causing issues for people: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058883
Would it not be prudent to revert such a patch, or better, never have applied it if the patch was not tested or proven working at all?!? It seems there are no logs or other details included about this issue, just a "it does not work" and "I restart it now it works" and then a patch for just restarting it. Would be great if there actually where logs for this issue or other details that would demonstrate the problem. Maybe time to remove this patch? As I have stated in various places: AICCU does not need to be restarted, the protocols used should handle it, that is why those protocols, exist. If the tunnel 'breaks', please provide details of what is broken so that the real problem can be addressed.... just restarting it does not resolve such a problem. Bigger note: If anybody has logs which demonstrate breakage please provide them, then I can take those situations along in the testing of the new AICCU. I've added to the to-check list to check with Virtualbox how a acpisleepbutton event affects the state of AICCU, thus lets see what the result of such a test is (best I can do, no Linux on a laptop anywhere near me at the moment... but this should be similar) Greets, Jeroen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058883 Title: start-on conditions in Upstart script prevent aiccu from restarting during resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/1058883/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
