Same when upgrading from 12.04 to Q:

--- /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc  2010-09-30 23:35:43.000000000 +0100
+++ /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc.dpkg-new 2012-09-02 15:23:30.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 [Bootstrap]
 HideEula=1
 Logo=1
-NativeProgress=true
-ProgressBarColor=171,117,61
-ProgressFrameColor=207,208,212
-ProgressPosition=15,228
-ProgressSize=405,7
+NativeProgress=false
+ProgressBarColor=255,255,255
+ProgressFrameColor=20,136,3
+ProgressPosition=61,317
+ProgressSize=407,6


** Description changed:

- When upgrading from 11.10 to 12.04 I encountered a debconf prompt for
+ Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 upgrade
+ Ubuntu 12.04 to Q upgrade
+ 
+ When upgrading I encountered a debconf prompt for
  /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc. It prompts me to keep the old, customized
  conffile or replace it with the new one. I ahve not modified this file,
  and I believe the debconf prompt should not appear. Instead I think we
  might have some broken conffile handling somewhere in libreoffice.
  
  The sofficerc file has not been touched in quite awhile, and I am fairly 
certain I have never modified it by hand:
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 152 Aug 24  2010 /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc
  
  Diff of old to new:
  
  --- /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc        2010-08-24 13:05:09.000000000 -0400
  +++ /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc.dpkg-new       2012-01-13 14:25:24.000000000 
-0500
  @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
-  HideEula=1
-  Logo=1
-  NativeProgress=true
+  HideEula=1
+  Logo=1
+  NativeProgress=true
  -ProgressBarColor=171,117,61
  -ProgressFrameColor=207,208,212
  -ProgressPosition=15,228
  -ProgressSize=405,7
  +ProgressBarColor=126,170,23
  +ProgressFrameColor=207,208,211
  +ProgressPosition=164,225
  +ProgressSize=319,10
  
- 
- I checked another system running 11.10, and the values in sofficerc are 
identical to the original version here, so presumably that system would be 
affected on upgrade too. Both systems I checked had OO.o installed as part of 
the original OS load, which was either 8.04 (this system) or10.10 (the other 
system I checked).
+ I checked another system running 11.10, and the values in sofficerc are
+ identical to the original version here, so presumably that system would
+ be affected on upgrade too. Both systems I checked had OO.o installed as
+ part of the original OS load, which was either 8.04 (this system)
+ or10.10 (the other system I checked).
  
  The md5sum of the original file on both 11.10 systems is:
  2a017cf788ad5557c0603ea9d4aa4aee  /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: libreoffice-common 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic 3.0.9
  Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: i386
  CheckboxSubmission: a098bfd5e654d8a6843b3807f9794817
  CheckboxSystem: 775fcefe2ffae0651480113c04106442
  Date: Wed Jan 18 13:59:05 2012
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: libreoffice
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-18 (0 days ago)
  mtime.conffile..etc.libreoffice.soffice.sh: 2008-04-22T06:14:27
  mtime.conffile..etc.libreoffice.sofficerc: 2010-08-24T13:05:09

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918352

Title:
  Debconf prompt for /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc when upgrading to
  precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/918352/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to