Hi, another thought:
Do we really need libgthread-2.0 for the gimp-plugin-registry? If not, to me it's better to remove it by the patch 'g_thread_init' function to fix FTBFS or so but for now I prefer the solution I mentioned. The question is: What is the author's intention? Are dependencies of certain code really required? IMHO as a packager I have to do anything for building the package without remove source code via patch or making workarounds. In this special case the author's intention is: I need g_thread_init. Basta! Therefore it has to be the packagers intension to look for errors in the surrounding build system, i.e. Gnu Autotools. OMG! What an English. Excuse me, I'm a German. Cheers Otto -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013003 Title: gimp-plugin-registry 5.20120523 fails to build in quantal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp-plugin-registry/+bug/1013003/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
