Was "-h" ever a valid switch?

The "-h" flag is not mentioned in the Wiki page for mkfs.btrfs [1].

The "-h" flag was included with a patch to the kernel, but that patch
was not incorporated into the kernel [2] [3]

In Ubuntu 12.04, the "-h" flag is invalid:

$ mkfs.btrfs -h
mkfs.btrfs: invalid option -- 'h'
usage: mkfs.btrfs [options] dev [ dev ... ]
options:
         -A --alloc-start the offset to start the FS
         -b --byte-count total number of bytes in the FS
         -d --data data profile, raid0, raid1, raid10 or single
         -l --leafsize size of btree leaves
         -L --label set a label
         -m --metadata metadata profile, values like data profile
         -n --nodesize size of btree nodes
         -s --sectorsize min block allocation
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19

$ lsb_release --description
Description:    Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

[1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Mkfs.btrfs
[2] https://www.google.com/search?q=%22mkfs.btrfs+-h%22
[3] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas

** Changed in: btrfs-tools (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961251

Title:
  mkfs.btrfs(8) does not explain -h switch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/btrfs-tools/+bug/961251/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to