I'd like to chime in here with a few observations.

1)  When gathering data from powertop one needs to ensure the sample time is 
long enough and also one takes a bunch of samples to ensure you are getting 
valid data.
2) The power consumption measurements from some batteries is tricky to estimate 
using tools like powertop because the battery sometimes re-calibrates the 
battery capacity measurements and this gives false estimations in userspace 
tools.
3) Twiddling all the powertop settings to GOOD settings may in fact on some 
hardware not actually do anything helpful, and in some cases may cause worse 
effects.  I've measured this using a high precision multimeter and I can back 
this assertion with hard data.

I've got a bunch of tools in my ppa which may be useful -  ppa:colin-
king/powermanagement

do:

sudo add-apt-repository  ppa:colin-king/powermanagement
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install powerstat

and then run powerstat to see what kind of power consumption you get
over a long period of time:

sudo powerstat

Powerstat will calculate average, min/max and standard deviation (the
latter is useful to see how accurate+reliable your battery measurements
are).

Also, I recommend taking measurements when you battery is fully charged
and using this as a starting point for all your testing to ensure you
are starting from a known baseline.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875801

Title:
  Linux power regeression is not improved from Natty to Oneiric to
  Precise - Netbook Zareason Terra HD

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/875801/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to