Launchpad has imported 28 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4536.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2005-09-21T11:54:06+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: poppler is not able to render all lines in PDF calendars from http://www.ii.uib.no/~arntzen/kalender/ (either regular or rhombic dodecaedrons). I'm using cairo (just in case it helps). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2005-09-21T14:48:00+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: gpdf and xpdf display these calendars fine. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2005-12-04T23:56:13+00:00 Kristian Hoegsberg wrote: I don't see any problems with these PDFs. Could you please attach the specific PDF you see a problem with and a screenshot. Alternatively, if the problem is gone, please close the bug. Thanks. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-04-12T13:13:12+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: Sorry, I forgot that. I use the lastest stable version and I don't get the images right. In the attachment you have what Acrobat displays and what evince displays. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-04-12T13:13:56+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: Created attachment 5264 acrobat display Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-04-12T13:14:44+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: Created attachment 5265 folding lines acrobat display Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-04-12T13:15:30+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: Created attachment 5266 folding lines evince display Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2006-04-12T13:16:16+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: Created attachment 5268 another evince display Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2007-01-14T14:51:56+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: Comment on attachment 5266 folding lines evince display In the attachments described as “folding lines”, acrobat displays the folding lines, but evince doesn't. The other two attachments show no difference in rendering (but I don't know how to remove them). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-01-11T10:37:10+00:00 Benjamin-close wrote: Bugzilla Upgrade Mass Bug Change NEEDSINFO state was removed in Bugzilla 3.x, reopening any bugs previously listed as NEEDSINFO. - benjsc fd.o Wrangler Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-17T20:55:13+00:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Can you check with a new poppler? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-05T17:36:42+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: Folding lines are not different than the ones displayed in the attachment three years ago using poppler-0.11.1 and evince-2.26.2. I hope it helps. Thanks, Pablo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-05T17:40:08+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: I realize that I haven't explained the issue accurately. Attachments 1 and 4 might be right (and poppler fixed), since folding lines are displayed fine. But attachments 2 and 3 are those with folding lines not properly displayed. I update the summary accordingly. I hope it is clear now. Pablo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-12T17:55:59+00:00 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Cairo only problem Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-16T12:22:33+00:00 Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: I've just generated one of those pdfs and I can see all the lines. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-16T20:56:56+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: (In reply to comment #14) > I've just generated one of those pdfs and I can see all the lines. Regular dodecahedron is displayed fine, but rhombic dodecahedron isn't. The folding lines are missing there. (Compare https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=5266 with https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=5265.) I hope it helps, Pablo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-08-02T16:32:59+00:00 Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: confirmed, it seems there's a problem when line_width < 1.0. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-08-02T16:33:28+00:00 Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: *** Bug 11288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-08-09T15:50:38+00:00 Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: *** Bug 21729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-08-09T17:51:18+00:00 Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: *** Bug 14315 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-07T08:21:07+00:00 Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: *** Bug 24228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-06-13T18:47:31+00:00 Freedesktop-pragmata wrote: Seems not to have been fixed in poppler-0.14.0 (tested with gtk-splash- test). Again, for some strange reason gtk-cairo-test seems not to be able to load it. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-07-13T15:18:56+00:00 Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: *** Bug 29043 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-08-23T11:52:24+00:00 Adrian Johnson wrote: Created attachment 50481 set minimum line width to 1 PDF has a Stroke Adjust parameter than when true requires that lines be at least 1 pixel wide. This patch adds a stroke_adjust parameter to CairoOutputDev that when true adjusts lines with a device width of < 0.5 pixels to be 0.5 pixels wide. Like the splash backend, the Stroke Adjust parameter is initialized from the globalParam setting (with default value true) and overrides the setting in the PDF file. This emulates Adobe Reader where the Stroke Adjust is controlled by the "Enhance Thin Lines" setting in Preferences (defaults to true) that overrides the SA in the PDF file. I found a minimum line of of 0.5 to produce better results than using 1.0 because unaligned horizontal and vertical 1.0 width lines in cairo are rendered 2 pixels wide. The test case in bug 14315 is a good example. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-08-23T11:57:15+00:00 Adrian Johnson wrote: Created attachment 50482 align 1 pixel wide lines This patch extends to the previous fix to align 1 pixel wide lines so that cairo renders them 1 pixel wide as described at http://www.cairographics.org/FAQ/#sharp_lines The minimum line width has been increased to 1 pixel wide now that the rendered width is 1 pixel wide. The test case in bug 14315 now renders almost exactly like Adobe Reader. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-08-23T13:42:33+00:00 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: Hey, it's great you tackle this kind of rendering glitches! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-08-28T11:10:49+00:00 Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: Yes!, thank you very much Adrian, both patches have been pushed to git master. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-02-16T12:12:55+00:00 Adrian Johnson wrote: *** Bug 14133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/comments/41 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603929 Title: does not display graphics of page 12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/603929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
