Russ, I'm a little confused here. As far as I can tell, Ubuntu has not modified update-rc.d at all from what Debian ships. You can confirm this by looking at the most recent collection of Ubuntu changelog entries in <http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/s/sysvinit/sysvinit_2.88dsf-13.10ubuntu9/changelog>, since we re-list all changes from Debian every time we merge.
Or you could just compare the two scripts: evan@caron:~$ schroot -c precise-amd64 sha1sum /usr/sbin/update-rc.d 6943e40e473cb3980af37be59aa9f26c745fe9c5 /usr/sbin/update-rc.d evan@caron:~$ schroot -c sid-amd64 sha1sum /usr/sbin/update-rc.d 6943e40e473cb3980af37be59aa9f26c745fe9c5 /usr/sbin/update-rc.d I haven't actually read update-rc.d yet, but it sounds like this could be caused by differences between dependency-based and legacy ordering. Is it possible that there's a bug there? And if so, would that be sufficient justification to adopt a change like this into the Debian packaging? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884402 Title: package libapache2-mod-shib2 2.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shibboleth-sp2/+bug/884402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
