@ Stéphane and/or Colin, I plan on doing some mini.iso testing in the near future, no help needed there as I've used it before. I just need to answer some of my own questions, such as whether "--no-install-recommends" is required when installing the various desktop environments. I'll just try both with and without, compare logs & results, etc.
My question is, in comment #9 Stéphane said, "I know some flavours of Ubuntu chose to ship with non-PAE by default, using one of these (probably xubuntu and lubuntu) would work too". Based on that would it be improper to subscribe both lubuntu-dev and xubuntu-dev to this bug report so we could get a definitive answer regarding their decisions? I personally have no effected hardware so my testing ability is limited, but ATM it looks like upgrades from Oneiric w/non-pae to Precise remain non-pae, and undoubtedly using the mini.iso will work, but I'd think both of those options would require fast ethernet (no problem here). It would just be nice to know for sure what Lubuntu and Xubuntu plan to do ;^) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897786 Title: Kernel is dropping non-PAE flavour To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/897786/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
