>Fewer notifications is a lose term. I can easily abuse the current functionality and keep triggering notifications. I just can't have them disappear as quickly as I might like, ie it doesn't respect the timeout.
Indeed. Canonical's policy does nothing to affect the number of possible notifications. This "feature" serves only to limit the functionality and convenience of notifications. How clearly do I have to say this? There is nothing good about ignoring the timeout parameter. There is no logical reason to ignore the timeout parameter. If we are going to use notifications at all they must acknowledge the timeout parameter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 Title: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/390508/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
