On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Serge Hallyn wrote:

> "calling it low because a workaround exists is invalid"
>
> Are you saying you consider this an invalid workaround?  If so please
> feel free to change it back to medium.  If not, then your opinion
> disagrees with the community docs
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance).

Mostly I'm just complaining.
But, from my perspective, saying "guest can be modified" is not a
valid response for lxc if you actually want lxc to be useful, especially
in openstack.  There will of course be some limitations for lxc on
openstack, but assuming people are willing to modify guests that work
perfectly well other places explicitly to fit inside lxc is not
reasonable.

So, i'd consider "modify guest to fit your hardware" comment here, very
similar to "install windows to make your hardware work".

(yes, i reallize its completely unreasonable, but if you want "lxc
everywhere", stuff has to "just work").

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900972

Title:
  lxc instance console output spewed to stdout

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/900972/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to