What's the standard here? I've already renamed the binary package to
libgoocanvas-2.0{,-common,-dev}. Should the source package just be
goocanvas-2.0 ? (I'm kind of confused by the existence of a
libgoocanvas3 package which just contains version 0.15).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858954

Title:
  [needs-packaging] goocanvas 2.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/goocanvas/+bug/858954/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to