What's the standard here? I've already renamed the binary package to libgoocanvas-2.0{,-common,-dev}. Should the source package just be goocanvas-2.0 ? (I'm kind of confused by the existence of a libgoocanvas3 package which just contains version 0.15).
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858954 Title: [needs-packaging] goocanvas 2.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/goocanvas/+bug/858954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs