@Reuben

Again and again people forget the "other Ubuntus": Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and
-- hopefully soon -- Lubuntu. They are very much supported by the Ubuntu
project and by Mark personally. It's curious that when people are
disappointed by Unity they turn not to the "other Ubuntus" but to other
operating systems entirely.

What is the conclusion? Apparently, supporting alternative "official"
Ubuntus is not working well. Either the community doesn't care for
these, appreciate them, or just has very low expectations (after being
burned by the "main" Ubuntu) and won't give them a chance.

The Ubuntu project may need to do a better job at raising the profiles
of these. But, even the ability to use GNOME Shell instead of Unity is
often overlooked, and it's right in the box. So, what's the problem?

I tend to think about usability problems in the simplest terms. What
would work for me is this: when you turn on your Ubuntu computer, and
are ready to login, you are greeted with this screen:

"Welcome to Ubuntu!

Ubuntu comes with several desktop experiences to match the diverse needs
of its community of users. You need to pick one now, but know that you
can always logout and try a different one. We recommend trying them all,
and welcome your feedback on each.

* Unity: If you don't know where to start, try this! It's polished,
fuss-free, and can satisfy those who prefer the mouse and also those who
prefer the keyboard. Unity does its best to stay out of your way and
keep you focused on your work and play. Unity is currently a work in
progress, but millions of users consider it done. Please let us know how
we can improve it! Note that at this time Unity has limited support for
multiple monitor setups.

* XFCE: A friendly variation of the classic desktop. Recommended if
you've used computers for years and don't want to change your habits.

* KDE: The most advanced integrated desktop environment in the world.
Enough said!

* LXDE: Another lean and mean variation of the classic desktop,
optimized for older computers. Also recommended for users seeking the
most lightweight desktop.

* GNOME Shell: Another innovative attempt to simplify the desktop
paradigm. Very mouse-friendly.

Check this box [x] if you don't want to see this message again. You can
always click on [button] to select a different desktop experience when
you login."

Of course, I don't expect the base Ubuntu install to include all
desktops, but it shouldn't be hard to install them off the Internet when
the user selects them. All flavors of Ubuntu could come with this
welcome screen, whatever their base desktop experience is.

It's not too easy to accomplish: right now, the desktop meta-packages
also pull in a lot of default apps (browsers, word processors, games,
etc.), which would make it far too heavy to easily switch. So, there
need to be simpler meta-packages that only install the shell and let you
keep the apps you are already are using. This will mean more work to
maintain them. But, I would suggest that maintaining these packages
might be a better idea than maintaining separate "other Ubuntus"
officially.

If Ubuntu can deliver such an experience, and make sure that each of the
desktops maintains high standards (with consistent Ambience and Radiance
themes?), then I don't see why anybody would ever dream of *not* using
Ubuntu. For reals.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882274

Title:
  Community engagement is broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/882274/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to