Urgh. So why is importance "Undecided"? As I've mentioned in a prior post, a regression of a feature in a LTS release is a big deal.
Also, according to post: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rhythmbox/+bug/787475/comments/20 (#20), the fix is included in the Rhythmbox source tree already, so theoretically, posting an updated version of this app in the LTS repo will fix this. How hard would it be to make an updated version of Rhythmbox available in a LTS 'testing' repo? Then we (the people writing these comments...) could try out the fix and report here if it works? (Or am I over simplifying things?) Given the amount of times this bug has been reviewed/reclassified, it seems a new version could have been posted to testing repo for the same effort. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787475 Title: Rhythmbox [0.12.8] & [0.12.5] Not Fetching Album Information From MusicBrainz To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rhythmbox/+bug/787475/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
