> but doesn't it seem silly to have an enabled service in inetd > that references binaries that no longer exist on disk?
Well, it's possible to use a different marker for package-level disabling vs. admin-level disabling of a service... note that the postrm *always* disables it when we're not purging, too. Anyway, I'm not sure we ever executed very well on this, just explaining how we got here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129 Title: samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/862129/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
