IMHO VF's suggestion is probably somewhat useful.

I'm still not sure how to avoid that commands that might not be
installed are mentioned on man pages -- maybe it cannot be avoided, or
maybe it would require fairly involved changes to the entire man system,
so that only those "see also" entries are displayed that belong to
programs that are installed. Maybe it's not even good to avoid this
perceived inconsistency. With Vf's suggestion, the user is not lost when
such non-installed commands are encountered, and given this extra
feature, it might even be possible to be more liberal in referencing
more (exotic) commands under "see also", seeing that the user can learn
how to find them. Another option that comes to mind would be to make the
man system show "see also"-references to all relevant programs,
installed or not installed, but make it mark or annotate the ones that
are not yet available on the system.

In any case, with the new feature, the urgency for further improvement
in this area is much lessened -- if anything, this bug could probably be
consigned to the back of the wishlist queue.

Do others have any thoughts on this, and/or agree/disagree? Feel free to
trash my comment if it helps the system. ;-)

-- 
'man wall' contains reference to talk(1), but talk is absent in Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to