I don't think that getting good-quality online docs is realistic for Feisty. Better to concentrate on getting it right for Gutsy.
I had a look at a2m.xslt this evening. One problem seems to be with the structure of the documentation - we're topic-based now, but whole categories are contained within one file. On the wiki, it would be more natural to have each topic on a separate page, but this doesn't seem to be possible to do with an xslt. It'd require an extra script to break each document up, which would have to handle linking and TOCs too. Nasty. While the HelpWikiQualityAssurance spec would undoubtedly be useful, I think it should form part of a broader plan for the documentation. My opinion is that we need to think long and hard about handling categorisation and different versions (as you mentioned), and then get some sort of concrete 'policy' in place. At the moment, I find the documentation to be all too 'spread out'; things seem to be located based on what type of documentation they are rather than where the user would expect to find them. -- Help for Current Release not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
