I'd expected the monitor on DVI-0 to be labelled as the monitor on DVI-0, and the one on DVI-1 to be labelled as being on DVI-1 so I could tell the config thingy which one should be to the left of the other.
I don't think I've ever felt particular need to identify which monitor or output is named as which except for those times when both are behaving in exactly the same way and I'd like them to not be - when one is configured in a position relative to another, I can identify which is which by moving the mouse around, for example. I seem to recall Gnome's monitor identification thing displaying a different label on each monitor - I've not got it to hand at the minute, but I'd have filed a bug there, too, had I noticed :) - is there some fundamental difference in how KDE and Gnome do multi displays? Either way, it might be what's expected from a technical standpoint (in that, from some part of X's point of view they *are* the same), but I suspect the average user (such as myself) would expect it to, well, identify the outputs. It just struck me as a spectacularly useless button when I clicked on it and each output appeared to claim to be both... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784761 Title: "identify outputs" doesn't identify outputs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
