For what it's worth, here's the code from initscripts.postinst:
if [ ! -f /etc/motd.tail ]
then
if [ -f /etc/motd ]
then
sed 1d /etc/motd > /etc/motd.tail
[ -s /etc/motd.tail ] || rm -f /etc/motd.tail
fi
fi
The "[ ! -f /etc/motd.tail ]" at the front means the code only fires if
/etc/motd.tail doesn't exist... and thus if leave an empty file there
(rather than deleting it completely), that should prevent the
motd->motd.tail copy from being performed on the next initscript
upgrade.
Still, it definitely seems like a bug for the "motd" file that has just been
generated by the /etc/updated-motd.d/ scripts to get copied into the
"motd.tail" file during a package upgrade....
Looking back in the revision history of that script, it seems this code was
added back in version 2.86.ds1-14.1ubuntu1 as part of the switch to a tmpfs
/var/run directory:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/lucid/sysvinit/lucid/revision/42/debian/initscripts/postinst?remember=42
Anyway, I wonder if this logic is still needed -- or, if so, if it could
at least be protected by a "if dpkg --compare-versions" statement to
make sure it only happens when it should?
(Or, at least, don't perform the copy if /etc/motd is already a symlink
to /var/run/motd...)
Nathan
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634387
Title:
creates motd.tail on postinst, which could mean duplicate entries in
/etc/motd
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs