@Bryce I hadn't seen that before I commented - sorry for any confusion added. I'm not aiming for a long debate, merely to find the cheapest overall solution.
For folk just reading the bug report, the concerns are: - having potentially a two-times increase in open bugs - making it harder to trawl through bugs and decide what to work on - obscure either the reporters name or the attachments And not mentioned: - closing bugs in changelogs will need two bug numbers in these cases. I can't really assess the cost of the overhead that these things will incur. Bryce did suggest just having apport not dupe things onto private bugs, but I don't see how that is functionally different. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764414 Title: private master bugs are confusing and lead to more duplicate filings -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
