Hi, 2011/2/21 Matthieu Baerts <matt...@gmail.com>: > Yes we understand why you do that (we guess that it's not only for the > fun ;) ) but if it's harder for the user too, I think it's not a good > solution.
Yes, I do not think that it is easy for all users to choose a package. I think that the one where user can install all plugin is simple in the user who does not understand what user should have chosen. And the provides of this function is performed in cairo-dock-plug-ins. However, all users may not be so. the user read description of the packages well, and who can understand which plugin is included in which package installs a package by oneself and will delete it. The method that you suggest can support only the former. With the present package, I come by both support. Which intends for all users whether it is a good thing? > > As said Fabounet, we use the same architecture as many programs like > Compiz but on Compiz there are not a package for each plugin. > Compiz does not depend on the CPU architecture. I depend on the hardware which a CPU working. Please BTS when Compiz is the architecture except IA32 and amd64, and there is a problem. I seem to work in most architecture now at least. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=compiz # Of course I think that there are many problems. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org} GPG ID: 40AD1FA6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564 Title: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
