Launchpad has imported 11 comments from the remote bug at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-10-15T22:03:09+00:00 Danglin wrote: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/ -B/home/ dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi/bin/ -B/home/dave/opt /gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi/lib/ -isystem /home/dave/opt/ gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi/include -isystem /home/dave/op t/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-include -g -O2 -O2 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissi ng-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/home/dave/opt/gnu/include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -g0 -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline -fno-exceptions -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-vectorize -I. -I. -I../.././gcc -I../../../gcc/libgcc -I../../../gcc/libgcc/. -I../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc -I../../../gcc/libgcc/../include -o crtbegin.o -MT crtbegin.o -MD -MP -MF crtbegin.dep \ -c ../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN ../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/crtstuff.c: In function '__do_global_dtors_aux': ../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/crtstuff.c:308:26: error: '__DTOR_LIST__' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/crtstuff.c:308:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in make[3]: *** [crtbegin.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi/libgcc' -bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -v Reading specs from ./specs COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=./lto-wrapper Target: armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi Configured with: ../gcc/configure --host=armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi --target=armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi --build=armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-checking=release --enable-shared --enable-threads --disable-multilib --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-symvers=gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0 --with-gmp=/home/dave/opt/gnu --with-as=/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/as --with-ld=/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20101015 (experimental) [trunk revision 165513] (GCC) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-10-15T22:07:38+00:00 Pinskia wrote: According to PR 21751, the issue was at least at one point was the glibc version that was being used did not have eabi support. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-10-15T23:04:27+00:00 John David Anglin wrote: Created attachment 22081 arm.h.d > --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-15 > 22:07:38 UTC --- > According to PR 21751, the issue was at least at one point was the glibc > version that was being used did not have eabi support. I'll take a look (don't have access to box at the moment). However, I have built GCC numerous times with the glibc on this box. For example, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-06/msg00246.html So, I'm doubtful this is the issue. Dave Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-10-18T18:28:07+00:00 John David Anglin wrote: On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040 > > --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-15 > 22:07:38 UTC --- > According to PR 21751, the issue was at least at one point was the glibc > version that was being used did not have eabi support. Attached change fixes the compile error. Doing a full bootstrap and check. Dave Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-16T13:36:34+00:00 Laurent GUERBY wrote: Any reason why this patch isn't submitted/commited? I still get the __DTOR_LIST__ error as of today on arm-linux without the patch. With the patch bootstrap succeeds. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-23T18:18:31+00:00 Matthias Klose wrote: applying this patch, I see excess errors in every testcase: /usr/bin/ld: warning: .init_array section has zero size /usr/bin/ld: warning: .fini_array section has zero size Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-23T18:29:43+00:00 Laurent GUERBY wrote: I see the same errors, the patch has: +# define INIT_ARRAY_SECTION_ASM_OP ARM_EABI_CTORS_SECTION_OP +# define FINI_ARRAY_SECTION_ASM_OP ARM_EABI_DTORS_SECTION_OP So might be related. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-23T18:45:14+00:00 John David Anglin wrote: > Any reason why this patch isn't submitted/commited? No. I was traveling and forgot about it. Access to the arm box on my desk is unreliable. Dave Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-26T10:32:43+00:00 Matthias Klose wrote: Looking at Debian/Ubuntu build logs: - the last sucessful build was 20100918-0ubuntu1. - 20101004-0ubuntu1 shows an ICE building stage2 libgcc - 20101004-0ubuntu1 shows an ICE building stage2 libgcc - 20101009-1 (Debian) shows the ICE -20101012-0ubuntu1 is the last one showing this ICE - 20101016-1 (Debian) shows the CTOR issue - 20101114-1 shows the current CTOR issue (building stage1 GCC) Maybe the issue was introduced between 20101012 and 20101016? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-12-07T19:17:16+00:00 Uweigand-gcc wrote: It looks like this was caused by this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01145.html gcc/ * config.gcc (arm*-*-linux-*eabi) <tm_file>: Add bpabi.h from libgcc. (arm*-*-uclinux*eabi) <tm_file>: Likewise. (arm*-*-eabi*) <tm_file>: Likewise. (frv-*-elf) <tm_file>: Add frv-abi.h from libgcc. (frv-*-*linux*) <tm_file>: Likewise. * config/arm/bpabi.h: Delete DECLARE_LIBRARY_RENAMES stanzas and associated helper macros. * config/frv/frv-abi.h: Delete. libgcc/ * config/arm/bpabi.h: New file. * config/frv/frv-abi.h: New file. For more details see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00608.html Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-12-13T16:23:55+00:00 Froydnj-gcc wrote: Author: froydnj Date: Mon Dec 13 16:23:50 2010 New Revision: 167751 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167751 Log: gcc/ PR target/46040 * config.gcc (arm*-*-linux-*eabi): Use bpabi-lib.h. (arm*-*-uclinux*eabi, arm*-*-eabi*): Likewise. libgcc/ PR target/46040 * config/arm/bpabi.h: Rename to... * config/arm/bpabi-lib.h: ...this. Added: trunk/libgcc/config/arm/bpabi-lib.h - copied unchanged from r167749, trunk/libgcc/config/arm/bpabi.h Removed: trunk/libgcc/config/arm/bpabi.h Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config.gcc trunk/libgcc/ChangeLog Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/659713/comments/29 ** Changed in: gcc Status: Unknown => Confirmed ** Changed in: gcc Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659713 Title: armel build failures 20101012 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
