Launchpad has imported 11 comments from the remote bug at http://bugs.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-18T07:07:28+00:00 Dquiroga wrote: Created an attachment (id=15) Fix-memory-leak-in-remote_listen.c-362 There are a few memory leaks in the slon process because some results of PQexec() calls are not always cleared, in remoteListenThread_main() (remote_listen.c) and in copy_set() (remote_worker.c) functions. Attached there are a proposed patches (against 1.2.14) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-18T07:08:45+00:00 Dquiroga wrote: Created an attachment (id=16) Fix-memory-leak-in-remote_worker.c-3032 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-18T07:09:49+00:00 Dquiroga wrote: Created an attachment (id=17) Fix-memory-leak-in-remote_worker.c-3067 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-18T07:10:52+00:00 Dquiroga wrote: Created an attachment (id=18) Fix-memory-leak-in-remote_worker.c-3111 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-20T15:20:52+00:00 Cbbrowne-ca wrote: Committed to the 1.2 branch... http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2008-June/002305.html I compared the CVS HEAD code; these changes do not seem necessary there, as the HEAD code has already been changed more extensively. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-23T07:00:22+00:00 Dquiroga wrote: The leaks on remote_worker.c were fixed but the one on remote_listen.c was not. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-10-15T22:28:17+00:00 Stuart Bishop wrote: http://slony.info claims this bug was fixed in 1.2.15. Should this bug report be closed now, or are there still outstanding issues? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-01-08T11:32:55+00:00 Frank-huddler wrote: I've been running 1.2.15 on a development server since it was released, and I'm still seeing memory leaks, which leads me to believe that Damian's comment #5 is correct -- not all of the leaks have been resolved. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-06-10T09:09:32+00:00 Ssinger wrote: Some more memory leak fixes have been committed to 2.0.4 and 1.2 after .21 (1.2.22 has not yet been tagged/released). Please retest with the memory leak fixes Ulrich Weber sent in. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-01-13T04:29:03+00:00 Jinkuihao wrote: I did not find that they say the bug 52 was fixed in the release note of 1.2.22. but when i did a test with 1.2.21 and 1.2.22 in same condition, i can see the usage of memory of slony process (1.2.21) increase slowly while i can not see the same phenomenon in 1.2.22---the usage of memory was kept in the same value. so i wonder if i made a mistake or maybe they fixed the bug in 1.2.22. is there anybody can tell me? thank you. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-01-13T05:10:23+00:00 Ssinger wrote: (In reply to comment #9) > I did not find that they say the bug 52 was fixed in the release note of > 1.2.22. but when i did a test with 1.2.21 and 1.2.22 in same condition, i can > see the usage of memory of slony process (1.2.21) increase slowly while i can > not see the same phenomenon in 1.2.22---the usage of memory was kept in the > same value. > > so i wonder if i made a mistake or maybe they fixed the bug in 1.2.22. is > there > anybody can tell me? thank you. You are correct. http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=slony1-engine.git;a=commit;h=f518c0636f12db60d041e2d61642a26756071954 contains additional memory leak fixes that are in 1.2.22 but not 1.2.21. This seems to have been missed from the release notes Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/slony-i/+bug/284187/comments/14 ** Changed in: slony-i/1.2 Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: slony-i Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: slony-i/1.2 Importance: Unknown => Medium ** Changed in: slony-i Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284187 Title: slon periodically leaks memory -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
