Launchpad has imported 44 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440055.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-10-30T01:06:56+00:00 Chris Cheney wrote: Created an attachment (id=248731) file exhibiting problem Converting a document with formulas and schedules to PDF causes various errors in numbers. (They seem to be hebrew or so instead of arabian). At each conversion, different numbers are affected, the former incorrect ones get partially correct. This appears to only happen on x86-64. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-03T16:49:40+00:00 Rodo wrote: I was able to replicate it with 3-0 branch as well as with trunk. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-11T19:07:50+00:00 Kendy wrote: 64bit, I'll take this one ;-) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-01-18T06:59:01+00:00 Chris Cheney wrote: I think this might not actually be 64bit specific as I found another bug report related to this which is for i386... https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/244353 Exporting this simple file as PDF causes the second half of the numbers to convert from arabic to hebrew. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15698985/test.odt This still occurs with ooo-build-3-0-1. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-08T16:20:23+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: I use OpenOffice.org (OpenSuSE) x86-64 (!!!) build from here (yast2 yum style repository) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/STABLE/openSUSE_11.1/ on an x86-64 system (now daily updated 11.1, but since 10.0). 1) Since OO.o 3.0 in exporting each file (also a simple one word odt) in pdf/A-1 format and reading it in a Microsoft Windows XP/Vista system with Adobe Acrobat Reader (9.x), Acrobat Reader complains about invalid color space and keep the his windows empty (after closing his error/warning message dialog). The same "bad" pdf, perfectly (!) opens and renders on Evince 2.24.1 or Okular 0.8.1/KDE 2.4.1 (all 64 bit builded apps). 2) In the same OpenSuSE/OpenOffice notebook I also see pdf exported document (from a Writer document with some Calc tables with formulas in it) with number in the calc tables converted from arabic (e.g. "1", "23", "5.400,34", ...) to hebrew (I suppose). Not all the table were affected, but each table is either completely affected or perfect, interesting behavior... This arabic/hebrew pdf opens and renders bad both on linux platform and Windows/Acrobat one. I have just retested both problems with the 2009-03-07 build: OpenOffice_org-3.0.1.3-1.1.x86_64.rpm 07-Mar-2009 06:26 (I choose a representative file). But all the problems still remain. Hope that help. Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-08T16:23:47+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Addenda... About 1) problem if I uncheck Pdf/A-1 export all exported documents read perfectly on all platforms. I don't know if the experienced problems are related... But perhaps... Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-16T14:19:27+00:00 Kendy wrote: Carlo: According to the comment 4, any chance to check on a 32bit system as well to be 100% sure if this is 64bit problem, or a general one? Thank you in advance! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-17T09:06:25+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Jan: I will try to install a 32bit system and check it asap! Than I will post here again! Have a nice day, Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:04:46+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=280908) simple odt file, created on a 64 bit Novell-OOo I 'm submitting 6 little files to make evident pdf A1 errors only on 64 bit OSes. Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:07:17+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=280909) Bad exported (!) 64 bit OOo A-1 pdf Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:09:09+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=280910) Well exported (!) 64 bit OOo A-1 pdf Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:11:05+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=280912) Well exported (!) 64 bit OOo normal (!) pdf Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:11:59+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=280913) Well exported (!) 32 bit OOo normal (!) pdf Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:15:53+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=280916) My OOo about window, with release and build versions Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:23:56+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=280918) Export of the issue original file (64 bit OOo, bad) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:25:01+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=280919) Export of the issue's original file (32 bit OOo, good) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:37:58+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Now, some words...! ;-) I have installed an updated OpenSuSE 11.1 32 bit system (P4, 1 Gbyte RAM). I have make the export of the original issue file with both the 32 bit and 64 bit systems (Novell-OOo are identical source versions as stated on the single attached png file of the about window). I have also exported my original odt file (with many object, calc tables, inside like original post file) in the 32 bit OOo. In both cases, only 64 bit pdf export fails (hebrew fonts)! ----------------------------------------------------------- I have attached both the pdf files (only those exported from the original issue file). I also have attached a new odt simple text file and the four pdf (normal and A-1) exported from both platform (32 and 64 bit). Only 64 bit pdf A-1 export fails! --------------------------------- Are these issues originating from the same bug? Hope that help. Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:38:44+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: I close need info status. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-21T17:37:04+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Hi Everyone! We are going to solve this issue... :-) I just perform some new tests with my documents and the official issue test .odt too. I have just updated my OOo to version 3.1.0.2 from here: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_11.1/ My notebook is an updated OpenSuSE 11.1 x86-64 installation (Intel Centrino dual core 3 MByte cache, EM64T capable, 4 GByte RAM... an Acer Aspire 8920G). I opened my test document and the issue's official one and exported them to both pdf and pdf/A-1a. My test viewers are: - 32 bit Adobe Acrobat Reader 9.1.1 italian on 64 bit Windows Vista HP 64 bit italian; - 64 bit evince 2.26.1 on gnome 2.27.x on OpenSuSE 11.1; - 64 bit okular 0.8.3 on KDE 4.2.3 release 120 on OpenSuSE 11.1. Both "pdf only" exports are now correct (yeah! ;-) ) on my 64 bit pc and correctly opens on each of the three test viewers. Both "pdf/A-1a" exports open on linux viewers but maintain some Hebrew font characters while Acrobat Reader still complains about invalid color space and keep the his windows empty (after closing his error/warning message dialogs, some subsequent ones). Now I post the two exported pdf versions of the issue test file. Hope this help, Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-21T17:42:18+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=293691) Export of the issue's original file (64 bit OOo, pdf only, good) I set obsolete three of my old attachments. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-21T17:44:55+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=293692) Export of the issue's original file (64 bit OOo 3.1.0.2, pdf/A-1a, bad) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-21T18:03:16+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: A final little consideration. Are the two ("pdf only" and "pdf/A-1a") pdf export software "modules" sharing too few (!) coding lines so that a bug fixing in the first one doesn't fix the second one for the "same" behaviour part? Are the two software "modules" better re-engineered together in a new one?! It seems to remember that an Italian coder develop the second one so I feel me particularly close to my fellow-citizen work. Hope to give us interesting ideas! ;-) Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-23T15:04:03+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Hi Everyone! I have just updated my OOo to version *3.1.0.4* from here: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_11.1/ I just perform some new tests with my documents and the official issue test .odt too. I have got the same results of my previous post (that for 3.1.0.2: pdf only perfect on all three test viewer and pdf/A-1a bad that opens only on evince and Okular) with some little differences: - with my personal test document I got an embedded calc table object (in the fourth page and as first export error from the first page besides I have 5 or calc table object before this one) with all digits in numbers as an empty character (the classical empty square that stay for undefined char). None Hebrew font char appear. Furthermore, as already experienced in the past, if I export only the fourth page the table is perfecly exported... En error drift or similar trouble? - the issue test document exports are bad in different area with respect to the same 3.1.0.2 ones. I attach them to this issue just now. Hope that help. Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-23T15:06:55+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=294062) Export of the issue's original file (64 bit OOo 3.1.0.4, pdf only, good) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-23T15:08:30+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=294063) Export of the issue's original file (64 bit OOo 3.1.0.4, pdf/A-1a, bad) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-05-28T16:35:40+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: No different behaviours with new 3.1.0.5 x86-64 release on http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_11.1/ Exported pdf are similar to 3.1.0.4 ones. I change status to Assigned and version to OpenOffice.org 3.1 with the hope to obtain more interest, attention to this problem. May Gentoo people, being experienced to parameterize code and compilation on many (!) different platforms, help us a lot?!!! Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/42 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-18T10:01:59+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Yesterday I updated to 3.1.0.98.1 OOo build from this repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_11.1/ I test it again both with this issue's test document and my one (a writer document with less than 10 calc table inserted inside it that seems to issue one in the mean of a writer document with some object inserted). In both cases I got (on my x84-64 platform): - pdf only exports are bad (some hebrew font charaters instead of arabic ones), but read both on linux (Okular Version 0.8.80 on KDE 4.2.90, GhostView 1.5, my evince 2.27.1 since a month ago refuse to read pdf at all, "PDF Document (application/pdf) not supported"...) and on Windows Vista Home Premium 64 bit on Abobe Acrobat Reader 9.1.2 (32 bit); - pdf/A-1a exports are fine (!), but read only on linux (Okular Version 0.8.80 on KDE 4.2.90); on Windows Vista Home Premium 64 bit on Abobe Acrobat Reader 9.1.2 (32 bit) I get the usual message that complains about an invalid color space. During lasts releases I get the best result on x86-64 platform respectively for: - pdf only exports from release 3.1.0.4 *appear to be perfect* and they read well on all test viewers and platforms (linux and Windows); - pdf/A-1a exports from release 3.1.0.98.1 *appear to be perfect* and they read well only on linux test viewers and platforms (linux and Windows); on Windows Vista Home Premium 64 bit on Abobe Acrobat Reader 9.1.2 (32 bit) I get the usual message that complains about an invalid color space. After this post will follow last two updated exports (pdf only and pdf/A-1a). Hope that help, Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-18T10:05:29+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=298923) Export of the issue's original file (64 bit OOo 3.1.0.98.1, pdf/A-1a, appear perfect but invalid color space on Acrobat on Windows) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/45 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-18T10:08:20+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=298924) Export of the issue's original file (64 bit OOo 3.1.0.98.1, pdf only, bad) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/46 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-18T10:15:51+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: 3.1.0.5 and 3.1.0.6 exports (never submitted, but stored on my pc so that you can ask for them if needed) have been always worse and never appear perfect. Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-26T11:38:06+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: 3.1.0.99.1 exports (pdf/A-1a and normal pdf) seem to be perfect (no more Hebrew chars!) and open in Evince (2.27.4) (updated OpenSuSE 11.1, x86-64, 2.6.29.6). So it happens in Windows, but only NON pdf/A-1a version opens while the pdf/A-1a export still raise the message "Invalid color space" in Acrobat Reader 9.1.2 (win32 version). I will next attach the exported pdf files. We are going to close this issue... ;-) Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/48 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-26T11:40:44+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=307758) Export of the issue's original file (64 bit OOo 3.1.0.99.1, pdf only, appear perfect) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/49 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-26T11:42:22+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: Created an attachment (id=307759) Export of the issue's original file (64 bit OOo 3.1.0.99.1, pdf/A-1a, appear perfect in linux but invalid color space on Acrobat on Windows) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-26T11:55:27+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: About "Invalid color space" on 64 bit platform export there already is an opened issue 467181 (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467181). So that, in my opinion, this issue could be closed! After some other tests, perhaps. My other own documents whose exports previous broken, now are fine but in the pdf/A-1a version still yield the "Invalid color space" message. So that we can only go on in the associated issue (467181). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/51 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-27T07:14:11+00:00 Kendy wrote: Carlo: Thank you a lot for your testing! Unfortunately I am not sure what exactly caused that the issue is fixed now :-( Petr, do you have an idea, please? Did you see a commit that could be related to this? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/52 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-27T12:23:36+00:00 Pmladek wrote: I am not aware about any related fix on ooo-build. I wonder if it might be related to an upstream fix. For example, http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102378 fixes a recent regression in the PDF export code. It seems that the code handling fonts is also shared with the printing functionality, ... Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/53 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-07-29T15:20:09+00:00 RGB wrote: I have the same problem: OOo 3.1, Novell build from the "ooo stable" repo change some number to another alphabet. Same file, same system but with Sun build work without problems. I'm using a 64 bits system with openSUSE 11.1 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-09T23:50:31+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: It seems that the problem has been finally fixed in the vanilla trunk: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106523 Someone may check if all the problems discussed in the current issue are fixed by the reported vanilla one? Have a nice day, Carlo Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/72 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-10T12:42:43+00:00 RGB wrote: @ Carlo Strata: I think the linked report is for another issue (problems with color space in exported pdf). This report is about characters being wrongly replaced on pdf export, and only affect Novell build. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/73 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-10T12:49:19+00:00 Carlo-strata wrote: But are you truly sure that the reported vanilla fix (C type related) doesn't fix this issue too??? This was and is my hypothesis but I can't check it at the moment. And you, could you check it? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/74 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-10T13:32:19+00:00 RGB wrote: As I said before, vanilla OOo do not show the problem. Only way to test if this fix the problem is to have a Novell build based on that vanilla build, and I don't have access to it now. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the "unstable" OOo branch for Novell build is based on OOO320_mX (X = 4 now) while the linked issue is solved for OOo 3.3, that is OOO300_mY with Y > 60 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-03T11:51:06+00:00 RGB wrote: It seems the problem is fixed with OOo 3.2 from "stable" repo. At least, I cannot reproduce it with same documents that gave problems on previous versions. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/90 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-03T13:30:15+00:00 Pmladek wrote: Thanks a lot for the feedback. I am closing this bug as fixed according to the comment #42. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/91 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-03T13:30:55+00:00 Pmladek wrote: . Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openoffice/+bug/244353/comments/92 ** Changed in: openoffice Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: openoffice Importance: Unknown => Medium ** Bug watch added: Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #467181 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467181 ** Bug watch added: OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker #102378 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102378 ** Bug watch added: OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker #106523 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106523 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244353 Title: [ooo-build] OpenOffice exports PDF with arabic numerals instead of regular numbers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
