15.11.2010 06:14, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > 10 days is too long? Really? > If it was really fixed in that 10 days and all people reporting here blaming Ubuntu are in reality just hadn't installed fresh updates or are using Mint instead then it was fast enough to call it "good level of support". If not - it's a shame for Ubuntu. And it is certainly a shame for Mint that this bug is still unfixed.
> Then you can use this as basis to report about Mint's failures to your > clients, > but please keep in mind that Ubuntu is not Mint. > It is certainly not. As for clients - unfortunately they prefer working workstations instead of reports about Mint's failures. About half of linux installations in production environment I've done last year were based on Mint LTS (rest were CentOS 5 based). Looking at the history of this bug I would reconsider to use Ubuntu instead of Mint in a near future, probably switching to the CentOS 6 as soon as it would be released. -- Best regards, Alexey Loukianov mailto:mooro...@mail.ru System Engineer, Mob.:+7(926)218-1320 *nix Specialist -- fsck progress stalls at boot, plymouthd/mountall eats CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571707 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
