you can see their comment by opening the upstream link attached to this bug.
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Victor Zamanian <640...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote: > Omer, what? What is "This" in that quote? I cannot make sense of that > quote in this context. > > The wording of the setting is wrong. Are you saying that nautilus > developers say that wording something wrong is intentional because video > files of gigabytes and a few megabytes are about as expensive as one > another, but not pictures? Please, I would appreciate a lot some > explanation for what you mean and what makes this invalid. > > -- > nautilus file preview does not respect file size limit > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640785 > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to > nautilus in ubuntu. > > Status in Nautilus: Invalid > Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: Invalid > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: nautilus > > Nautilus displays thumbnails regardless of file-size limit set in nautilus' > preferences. The setting above it (show always/never/for local files only) > does work; it is only the file-size limit that isn't respected. > > $ lsb_release -rd > Description: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS > Release: 10.04 > > $ aptitude show nautilus | grep Version > Version: 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1 > > What I expect to happen: nautilus respecting setting for thumbnail > file-size limit. > > What happens instead: nautilus does not respect setting for thumbnail > file-size limit. > > > -- nautilus file preview does not respect file size limit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
