Several bugs I'm on the list for have been retrospectively marked as
'Critical' after being closed as fixed. There may be a good reason for
this in each case, but given that several of them had no priority set or
were a lower priority and had been left unsolved for quite some time it
does look suspiciously like skewing of statistics. ('we've fixed X
critical bugs' or 'we fixed 97% of all critical bugs', etc., except that
they weren't critical until after they were fixed)As I said, there may be a very good reason which I've missed or it could be coincidence. I also apologise for posting this here as it may not be the most appropriate place to raise such concerns, but I have no idea of anywhere else more appropriate. -- [apport] totem-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV in decode_mb_cavlc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
