Yes, they can. I see no reason why libopenal.so.0 and libopenal.so.1 cannot both exist. Some minor patching may be required for configuration file paths (I believe the libraries both use the same path/files in /etc but have different expectations about the contents of them)
directhex, you seem far more familiar with them than I. Are there any reasons why my suggestion is impractical/impossible? -- /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
