Seroiusly, Gnome is suffering of some sort of anorexia. The project wanted to remove and declutter itself. And that's ok. But then, when it is ok, it started to cut more and more of itself. We say, hey Gnome, you are cute that way! but Gnome keeps telling, i'm still fat... We need options. Simple options, yes, but options. We can't be forced to use something that is mostly an aestethic thing nowadays if we cannot setup it to suit OUR sense of aesthetics.
Also, Marc... is simpliciy, the kind of simplicity Gnome is looking for, to tell us to go down and edit the code of an screensaver? from my point of view that's not simple... and your answer was rude... something like "I'm not willing to code that, so go yourself and deal with the barebones of it"... In my opinion... if you are not willing to enhance the user experience... why not to give this project to somebody else? ** Tags added: aesthetics regression ** Tags added: customization -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
