Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: indicator-network
Why does indicator-network have to front-end connman when network-
manager already has all the features a desktop user needs for network
management such as Mobile Broadband, VPN, etc.
Why can't indicator-network be rewritten to be a front-end replacement
for network-manager-gnome (the Notification Area front-end for network-
manager). Surely this would be a much better option. I would of thought
that it would be easier to rewrite indicator-network to work with
network-manager (and change network-manager so it doesn't depend on
network-manager-gnome anymore) than to implement the necessary features
in connman and provide front end options for these new features in
indicator-network?
** Affects: indicator-network (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: connman indicator-applet indicator-applett-complete indicator-network
network-manager network-manager-gnome
--
Does not support Mobile Broardband
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606887
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
