On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:09:20AM -0000, John Dong wrote: > It's probably better if SRU versioning conventions are used (i.e. > 1ubuntu2.1) and the lucid+1 upload be -1ubuntu3, though it probably > doesn't matter too much.
I considered that, but I'm unclear on whether that is actually necessary in this case, since the lucid+1 repo hasn't opened yet. > Make sure we keep appropriate tasks open to get this committed to > lucid+1 though. No prob, the patch is already committed to our git tree so will get into lucid+1. -- [savage] glblur crashed with SIGSEGV in _mesa_CopyTexImage2D() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
