Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org
Hi, many of the labels in oowriter seem to have background corruption as a result, my guess would be, of invalid memory addressing; my guess is it's connected to the 64-bit edition, as I've noticed a similar effect in a more boutique application [firstclass 10] that initially had difficulty linking to the correct libs, until some kde3 32-bit libs were put into lib32 [according to http://blog.isnotworking.com/2007/11/opera-9-on-ubuntu-with-amd64.html] I should say that the openoffice bug was already there before the firstclass .deb was installed / the kde3 32-bit libs added, so it's reasonably independent; from the image you see the main areas, I should say that changing the selected items in the selects, makes no difference to the quality of the selected item, although the actual lists, similar to the actual menus, appear normally; I'd have to suppose that there are more 32-bit libs that I need? possibly it's the code itself though ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.2.0-4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-20.30-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-20-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 14 13:41:06 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100406.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- label background memory corruption 64-bit writer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562967 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
