Brian Murray,
Thanks for taking a look at this.

I have recreated the problem to the extent that I ran into it at least
twice on successive installs to the same machine, first immediately
after installing Kubuntu Lucid alternate CD, as described in Bug #548572
(about March 27, 2010) and second, Bug #550905 (on April 5, 2010).
Please read also my comments on Bug #558758 in which I question the
behaviour of Apport.

As those comments will show, I am bothered that configuration failures
of new development versions get marked as duplicates of old bugs from
previous development cycles; bugs which have been studied, fixed and the
fix released.

It is perfectly possible for an entirely new bug in a new development
version to show remarkably similar symptoms to a bug in a previous
development version. That alone does not make it a duplicate of the
previous bug.

Marking it as a duplicate significantly increases the risk that it will
pass unnoticed during the QA process before final release. If a reviewer
runs afoul of it after release, the risk for more anti-Ubuntu FUD is
high.

This is the risk that I am trying to flag --- while trying to avoid
whinging and whining on the ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list.

I see two priorities:
1. In the short term, look at this and other configuration bugs which could 
harm the reputation of Lucid as an LTS release (#4511005, #548510, #338095);
2. Rewrite Apport so that it handles better new configuration bugs with 
strikingly similar symptoms to older, fixed ones

I hope this helps to explain why I reopened this old bug.

-- 
jockey-gtk crashed with ImportError in <module>()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335543
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to