Whatever Mark has got up his sleeve, I think it's a very bad decision to partially implement it in an LTS release. A lot of the user-base (read: non-geek users) will be using this release until the next LTS in 2012. Where is the logic in leaving them stuck with a partially implemented feature for this length of time?
>From the LTS wiki: > We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, auto-synching with > Debian testing, instead of Debian unstable. > We start stabilizing the release early by significantly limiting the number > of new features. We will choose which features we package into the LTS > release, versus which ones we leave out and allow for users to optionally > download and use from a separate archive. > Avoid structural changes as far as possible, such as changing the default set > of applications, lots of library transitions, or system layer changes > (example: introducing KMS or hal → DeviceKit would not have been appropriate > changes in a LTS). Change it in 10.10 Alpha 1 if you want time to gather data and feedback. -- [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to "menu:minimize,maximize,close" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
