On 9 February 2010 04:18, John Dong <jd...@johndong.com> wrote: > I'd be fine with approving the backport as-is due to the launchpad > incompatible usecase, but are we also interested in backporting the most > popular bzr plugins (i.e bzrtools?) as well?
Yes, it would be good to take them all from karmic-updates. The ones currently in hardy may not work with 2.0.x, in which case perhaps the 2.0.x package should conflict with them? -- Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/> -- Please backport bzr 2.0.2 from karmic-updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
