I'm indifferent upon either approach. I'm happy to make either set of
changes as long as it's functional.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 15:51, Lionel Le Folgoc <lio...@lefolgoc.net>
wrote:
> To add some problems (found by Didier) about my proposed approach:
> - clutter /etc/X11/Xsession.d with two mores files (maybe not so grave)
> - difficult to enable selectively (our files would be sourced
> unconditionally, even on gnome sessions) without checking GDMSESSION (which
> is already done by 60xdg_path-on-session, so duplicate work here...)
>
> The biggest drawback is that xdg dirs will change from
> /etc/xdg/{xu,myth}buntu to /etc/xdg/xdg-{xu,myth}buntu, so we'll have to
> do lots of conffiles' moves in {pre,post}inst...
>
> I've no strong opinion on that. TBH, Didier's idea looks cleaner (but
> that's just me :p).
>
> Mario, what do you think?
>
> --
> xfconf dbus service doesn't know about XDG user variables
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327926
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
Mario Limonciello
supe...@gmail.com
--
xfconf dbus service doesn't know about XDG user variables
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327926
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
