> This seems to break xsplash for 1024x768
Well, what breaks xsplash is that the package in karmic-proposed has
dropped *all* images other than the largest, when what was requested was
only to drop those with the same aspect ratio. This is a regression,
yes; marking as such.
** Tags added: regression-potential
** Tags added: regression-proposed
** Tags removed: regression-potential
** Tags added: regression-update
** Tags removed: regression-proposed
** Also affects: xsplash (Ubuntu Karmic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: xsplash (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Cody Russell (bratsche)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu Karmic)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu Karmic)
Milestone: None => karmic-updates
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu Karmic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cody Russell (bratsche)
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress => Triaged
** Changed in: xsplash (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Medium => High
** Changed in: xsplash
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
ubuntu-xsplash-artwork contains redundant graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438244
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
