2009/10/17 Michał Gołębiowski <mz.go...@gmail.com>: > @David E. Fox > Ad. 1) See > http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/karmic/partner/binary-i386/Packages > As You see, it is *not* empty. Opposite to this one: > http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/karmic/partner/binary-amd64/Packages
That is almost useless. I double checked the links - the first one says it is a Karmic repository, but it is in fact a Jaunty package as per the description, unless of course it actually is verifiable as a valid solution, and if it is, then it mighyt be the right suggestion. In generalities though, it is improper to suggest putting something up saying it is for a specific version of Ubuntu where it clearly states that it may not be. That could lead to a broken box. I suspect I had a 64 bit reader for some time when I ran 64 bit (and I have been 64 bit on Ubuntu since 5/2008) but my memory is a bit fading. Of course, should a bona fide verifiable link to "acroread" exist then maybe it's a valid bug. But if even so, it should be filed "wishlist" just on the general principle that the original filer of the bug is really asking that he wishes acroread to be in Karmic, not that it is an omission to not have it yet. -- thanks for letting me change the magnetic patterns on your hard disk. -- Karmic 64 bit: Package acroread is missing from partner repo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
