On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 20:19 +0000, Rob Speer wrote: > Scott, that's a good explanation for how I can fix the situation in my > case. > > Still, I don't think it's desirable to bail out to a root prompt just > because the hardware clock is wrong, no matter how that came to be. > I agree.
Scott -- Scott James Remnant sc...@ubuntu.com ** Package changed: sysvinit (Ubuntu) => e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Scott James Remnant (scott) ** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: High Assignee: Scott James Remnant (scott) Status: Triaged ** Also affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: None => ubuntu-9.10 -- superblock last write time is in the future https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs