On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 20:19 +0000, Rob Speer wrote:

> Scott, that's a good explanation for how I can fix the situation in my
> case.
> 
> Still, I don't think it's desirable to bail out to a root prompt just
> because the hardware clock is wrong, no matter how that came to be.
> 
I agree.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
sc...@ubuntu.com


** Package changed: sysvinit (Ubuntu) => e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Scott James Remnant (scott)

** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Karmic)
   Importance: High
     Assignee: Scott James Remnant (scott)
       Status: Triaged

** Also affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu Karmic)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Karmic)
    Milestone: None => ubuntu-9.10

-- 
superblock last write time is in the future
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to