On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:14:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 25 September 2009 at 21:55, Colin Watson wrote: > | Dirk, do you have a package somewhere that fixes this? Your comments > | above inclined me to think that you did, but I don't know where to look. > > Sorry -- didn't publicize that all that well. It is in the 'revor' PPA: > > https://launchpad.net/~revor/+archive/ppa > > | I'd be happy to guide that into Karmic, or to simply apply the fix given > | by spaetz if you say the word. > > It should already be in Karmic. I tend to do the package work, Scott R does > the uploads and Scott K approves them.
It's not yet in Karmic; that's why I asked. :-) (It's not in any approval queue either, as far as I can see.) You left debian/changelog~ and debian/Rprofile.site~ lying around in the diff - presumably unintentional? I removed it, and uploaded your package otherwise unmodified except for changelog updates. I'd like to get this fixed for the 9.10 beta, hence the rush - Scott R, I hope I'm not stepping on your toes. Although I didn't change it for this upload since I wanted to discuss it with you, I think that for Karmic it would be a good idea to put the dependencies back the way they were before 2.9.2-2ubuntu1~ppa2, even if they need to stay otherwise in your PPA; do you disagree? In particular, if the dpkg dependencies are left the way they are at the moment then it will be possible for partial upgrades to go wrong, AFAICS. I'd rather give correct dependencies in Karmic precedence over installability on Jaunty, at least for packages in the main archive. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
