On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 20:16 +0000, Steve Bergman wrote: > James, with all due respect that is absolutely out of the question. I > have 70 business users with stable desktops now that "ulimit -n" is set > to an appropriate value. You are asking me to essentially crash 70 users > in three cities, and then clean up all the domino effect problems, like > residual evolution processes, etc. as users report them to me. I cannot > justify that when it is clear that since dbus opens some 20 or so files > per desktop, 1024 is just a ridiculously low value for a real desktop > server. > The request was to find out where in the code it's looping, since that's clearly a bug as well. Unlike out-of-memory situations, the number of open files isn't going to go down by spinning in one place.
> If we do this test, I'll need an address at Canonical to send the > support bill to, along with compensation for my customer's losses. > Because they would *never* approve this experiment otherwise. > This is a most unhelpful attitude. Perhaps you'd like to bear in mind how much money *you* have given Canonical for the use of Ubuntu, which is clearly benefiting your business. Scott -- Scott James Remnant sc...@canonical.com -- dbus needs more than the default 1024 open files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
